+Pros
- Broad current model selection1 · 100%
- Low IDE adoption friction1 · 100%
- Polished Cascade workflow1 · 100%
Windsurf
byCodeiumlisted Jun 3, 2026
Coding AgentsFreemiumEasy setupClaude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro
Windsurf is Codeium's flagship AI IDE, positioned as the main Cursor alternative with its own "Cascade" agent that maintains a persistent context of your project across sessions. It offers a clean, opinionated UX and competitive pricing that has attracted a fast-growing community of developers switching from Cursor. Windsurf's Flows feature enables deep multi-step agentic workflows within the IDE.
Freshness note: AI-agent behavior can change after model releases, client updates, pricing changes, or new default settings. Use the aggregate score as a historical baseline and check recent reviews plus model/runtime context before deciding.
- Pricing
- Free tier; Pro $15/mo; Teams $35/user/mo
- Model backbone
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro
- Setup complexity
- Easy setup
- Last reviewed
- Jul 30, 2026
- Recent signal
- 1 in 90 days
What reviewers consistently say.
Top pros and cons surfaced from 1 review. Counts reflect how many loaded reviews cite each point.
−Cons
- Plan limits need workload testing1 · 100%
- Product transition makes old comparisons stale1 · 100%
1 reviews.
Sorted by recency, with helpful votes used as a tie-breaker.
RE
Ruling Editorial — Engineeringfresh
1-6 months usage·IDE-native feature work with supervised agent execution·Jul 30, 2026
8.2/10
Capable agentic IDE, but verify the Devin transition
Ruling editorial benchmark: Windsurf's Cascade combines code and chat modes with tool use, checkpoints, real-time awareness, and linter integration inside the editor. That package is a strong fit for developers who want supervised multi-file work without moving their primary workflow into a terminal. Official Windsurf pages now surface Devin Desktop branding and revised plans, so buyers should confirm current packaging before standardizing on it.
+ ProsPolished Cascade workflow · Broad current model selection · Low IDE adoption friction
− ConsPlan limits need workload testing · Product transition makes old comparisons stale
24 helpfulReviewed Jul 30, 2026
Similar agents.
Coding Agents agents you might also consider, sorted by aggregate score.
Claude Code
Anthropic · Usage Based
Claude Code is Anthropic's CLI-native agentic coding tool, running directly in the terminal with deep filesystem and shell access. It reads the entire codebase context and can autonomously edit files, run tests, and commit code — making it a favourite among power users who prefer a terminal-first workflow. Claude Code is widely regarded as the most capable agent for complex, multi-file refactors.
9.6/10 · 1 reviewsCompare
Compare windsurf with claude-code
Cursor
Anysphere · Freemium
Cursor is the most popular AI-powered IDE, built as a fork of VS Code with deep model integration across autocomplete, chat, and inline edits. It supports multiple frontier models and has become the reference point for all coding agent comparisons. Its CMD+K and Composer features enable both single-file edits and full multi-file agentic workflows.
9.4/10 · 1 reviewsCompare
Compare windsurf with cursor
Codex CLI
OpenAI · Usage Based
Codex CLI is OpenAI's open-source terminal-based coding agent, positioned as direct competition to Claude Code and Aider. Running in your local terminal, it can read your codebase, write and edit files, and execute shell commands with configurable approval modes. As OpenAI's answer to Anthropic's Claude Code, it's generated significant interest among developers already in the OpenAI ecosystem.
9.2/10 · 1 reviewsCompare
Compare windsurf with codex-cli