+Pros
- Integrated runtime and hosting1 · 100%
- Strong prototype velocity1 · 100%
- Very fast browser setup1 · 100%
Bolt.new
byStackBlitzlisted Jun 3, 2026
Coding AgentsFeaturedFreemiumEasy setupClaude 3.5 Sonnet
Bolt.new is a browser-based full-stack agent that scaffolds, runs, and deploys complete web applications from a single prompt — no local setup required. Built on StackBlitz's WebContainers, it has become the leading "vibe coding" tool for rapid prototyping and has spawned an ecosystem of open-source forks. It is especially popular with non-developers and startup founders who want functional MVPs without writing code.
Freshness note: AI-agent behavior can change after model releases, client updates, pricing changes, or new default settings. Use the aggregate score as a historical baseline and check recent reviews plus model/runtime context before deciding.
- Pricing
- Free (limited daily tokens); Pro $20/mo; Teams plans available
- Model backbone
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- Setup complexity
- Easy setup
- Last reviewed
- Aug 7, 2026
- Recent signal
- 1 in 90 days
What reviewers consistently say.
Top pros and cons surfaced from 1 review. Counts reflect how many loaded reviews cite each point.
−Cons
- Production architecture still needs engineering review1 · 100%
- Token use grows with project size1 · 100%
1 reviews.
Reviews from users with 6+ months of usage or long-running production context.
RE
Ruling Editorial — Engineeringfresh
1-6 months usage·browser-based MVP and internal-tool prototyping·Aug 7, 2026
8.4/10
Fast full-stack prototypes with token economics to watch
Ruling editorial benchmark: Bolt.new is one of the fastest browser-based paths from a prompt to a running web application because generation, runtime, hosting, and backend services are integrated. It is especially useful for prototypes, internal tools, and founder-led MVP exploration with no local setup. Larger projects consume more tokens as file context grows, so production hardening, architecture review, and plan economics become the main constraints after the first demo.
+ ProsVery fast browser setup · Integrated runtime and hosting · Strong prototype velocity
− ConsToken use grows with project size · Production architecture still needs engineering review
22 helpfulReviewed Aug 7, 2026
Similar agents.
Coding Agents agents you might also consider, sorted by aggregate score.
Claude Code
Anthropic · Usage Based
Claude Code is Anthropic's CLI-native agentic coding tool, running directly in the terminal with deep filesystem and shell access. It reads the entire codebase context and can autonomously edit files, run tests, and commit code — making it a favourite among power users who prefer a terminal-first workflow. Claude Code is widely regarded as the most capable agent for complex, multi-file refactors.
9.6/10 · 1 reviewsCompare
Compare bolt-new with claude-code
Cursor
Anysphere · Freemium
Cursor is the most popular AI-powered IDE, built as a fork of VS Code with deep model integration across autocomplete, chat, and inline edits. It supports multiple frontier models and has become the reference point for all coding agent comparisons. Its CMD+K and Composer features enable both single-file edits and full multi-file agentic workflows.
9.4/10 · 1 reviewsCompare
Compare bolt-new with cursor
Codex CLI
OpenAI · Usage Based
Codex CLI is OpenAI's open-source terminal-based coding agent, positioned as direct competition to Claude Code and Aider. Running in your local terminal, it can read your codebase, write and edit files, and execute shell commands with configurable approval modes. As OpenAI's answer to Anthropic's Claude Code, it's generated significant interest among developers already in the OpenAI ecosystem.
9.2/10 · 1 reviewsCompare
Compare bolt-new with codex-cli