Lindy.aivsMake AIvsManus

3 agents, 1 evaluations — 0 community and 1 editorial — compared across overall score, task fit, reliability, cost, ease of setup, and drift over time.

Current verdict: Lindy.ai is the only agent here with current scored evaluations; use the other profile as context rather than a head-to-head winner.

Current signal

last 90 days

Freshness

No loaded evaluations from the last 90 days

Version context

reviews now ask model/runtime and tier

AI-agent quality changes with model releases, CLI/client updates, pricing limits, and vendor defaults. Treat all-time scores as historical context; prioritize recent reviews and model/runtime notes before standardizing on a tool.

ruling.so/compare/lindy-ai-vs-make-ai-vs-manus

New comparison Add review

Overall scoreaggregate · 1–10

Lindy.ai

Lindy · Task Automation

8.4/10

Make AI

Make (formerly Integromat) · Task Automation

0.0/10

Manus

Monica / acquired by Meta · Task Automation

0.0/10

Add agent

Scorecard

Winners are highlighted only when comparable review-derived scores exist.

1 evaluations considered

Overall

Weighted aggregate verdict across the review.

8.4/10

4.2/5 source average.

—

No review data yet.

—

No review data yet.

review avg

Task fit

How well the agent matches the job users hired it for.

8.8/10

4.4/5 source average.

—

No review data yet.

—

No review data yet.

review avg

Reliability

Consistency, uptime, and repeatability under real workflows.

8.0/10

4.0/5 source average.

—

No review data yet.

—

No review data yet.

review avg

Ease of setup

How quickly teams can get from signup to useful output.

8.2/10

4.1/5 source average.

—

No review data yet.

—

No review data yet.

review avg

Cost efficiency

Whether the results justify the seat, usage, or platform cost.

7.8/10

3.9/5 source average.

—

No review data yet.

—

No review data yet.

review avg

Drift score

How well quality holds up over longer sessions and releases.

8.0/10

4.0/5 source average.

—

No review data yet.

—

No review data yet.

review avg

At a glance

A truthful, data-backed summary of where each agent stands today.

Lindy.ai

Lindy · Task Automation

Top score

Lindy is a personal AI assistant for task automation, able to manage your email, schedule meetings, qualify sales leads, and run multi-step workflows without code. Its no-code workflow builder connects to over 3000 apps and supports complex conditional logic, making it a powerful Zapier alternative for AI-native automations. Lindy's "Society of Lindies" architecture lets multiple agents collaborate on complex tasks.

Best signalStrong no-code operator for sales and admin workflows

Make AI

Make (formerly Integromat) · Task Automation

Make is a visual automation platform with native AI capabilities, allowing users to build complex workflows that incorporate LLMs, image generation, and AI decision-making alongside 2000+ app connectors. Its drag-and-drop scenario builder can create sophisticated AI automations with branching logic, error handling, and data transformation. Make's pricing model (operations-based rather than task-based) makes it cost-effective for high-volume automations.

Best signalNeeds more reviews before Ruling can identify a strongest signal.

Manus

Monica / acquired by Meta · Task Automation

Manus is a Chinese-developed general-purpose AI agent that can autonomously browse the web, write and execute code, manage files, and complete complex multi-step tasks — initially released to massive viral interest. Its acquisition by Meta for approximately $2 billion signals how highly Big Tech values general-purpose agent capabilities. Manus continues to operate independently while its technology is integrated into Meta's AI strategy.

Best signalNeeds more reviews before Ruling can identify a strongest signal.

Pricing and specs

Static facts from the Ruling catalog, not prototype estimates.

Top review for each

Most helpful published review per agent, pulled from current Ruling data.

Browse all reviews →

Top review↓ most helpful

Ruling Editorial — Operations

Ruling editorial benchmark · older signal · Apr 19, 2026

Strong no-code operator for sales and admin workflows

Ruling editorial benchmark: Lindy is strongest when a team can describe repeatable office workflows around email, calendar, CRM, and enrichment tasks. It gives operators a practical AI automation layer without asking them to build full custom software. The main work is designing and debugging edge cases before trusting it with high-volume operations.

↑ 18 found helpfulRead →

No published review yet

Make AI needs more community signal before Ruling can surface a most-helpful review.

View agent

No published review yet

Manus needs more community signal before Ruling can surface a most-helpful review.

View agent

Adjacent matchups

If you are comparing these agents, these nearby alternatives are worth opening next.

/compare/lindy-ai-vs-browserbase

Lindy.ai leads by 0.0 on current Ruling scores; compare it against Browserbase before shortlisting.

2 reviews

/compare/lindy-ai-vs-zapier-ai

Lindy.ai leads by 0.2 on current Ruling scores; compare it against Zapier AI Actions before shortlisting.

2 reviews

/compare/lindy-ai-vs-convergence-ai

Lindy.ai leads by 8.4 on current Ruling scores; compare it against Convergence before shortlisting.

1 reviews

Share this comparison

Send the URL to teammates when you need a compact, review-backed agent shortlist.

/compare/lindy-ai-vs-make-ai-vs-manus

Build another comparison