2 agents, 2 evaluations — 0 community and 2 editorial — compared across overall score, task fit, reliability, cost, ease of setup, and drift over time.
Current verdict: ChatGPT Advanced Data Analysis currently leads Devin by 1.2 points on Ruling's 10-point scale; confirm the top-review context before shortlisting.
Current signal
last 90 days
Freshness
1 of 2 loaded evaluations are from the last 90 days
Version context
reviews now ask model/runtime and tier
AI-agent quality changes with model releases, CLI/client updates, pricing limits, and vendor defaults. Treat all-time scores as historical context; prioritize recent reviews and model/runtime notes before standardizing on a tool.
Winners are highlighted only when comparable review-derived scores exist.
2 evaluations considered
Weighted aggregate verdict across the review.
4.4/5 source average.
3.8/5 source average.
How well the agent matches the job users hired it for.
4.5/5 source average.
4.0/5 source average.
Consistency, uptime, and repeatability under real workflows.
4.0/5 source average.
3.5/5 source average.
How quickly teams can get from signup to useful output.
4.8/5 source average.
4.1/5 source average.
Whether the results justify the seat, usage, or platform cost.
4.5/5 source average.
3.0/5 source average.
How well quality holds up over longer sessions and releases.
3.8/5 source average.
3.7/5 source average.
A truthful, data-backed summary of where each agent stands today.
OpenAI · Data & Analytics Agents
ChatGPT Advanced Data Analysis lets users upload files, run code-backed analysis, create charts, and iterate on questions in a chat workflow. It is the strongest general-purpose ad hoc analysis assistant, though governed BI, reproducibility, and secure data access require additional process.
Cognition · Coding Agents
Devin was the first publicly announced "AI software engineer," capable of planning and executing full engineering tasks across a sandboxed environment with browser, terminal, and code editor. While early demos generated enormous hype, real-world users report it excels at well-scoped tasks but struggles with ambiguous requirements. Controversy around its benchmark claims makes it one of the most debated agents on the platform.
Static facts from the Ruling catalog, not prototype estimates.
Pricing and model availability change quickly. Ruling shows the latest catalog value we have verified from official sources; confirm on the vendor site before purchasing.
Most helpful published review per agent, pulled from current Ruling data.
Ruling editorial benchmark: ChatGPT Advanced Data Analysis is one of the most useful general-purpose tools for exploring files, running code-backed analysis, and iterating on charts or data questions. It scores highly for accessibility and breadth. The caveat is governance: teams still need reproducibility, data controls, and human review for important analysis.
Ruling editorial benchmark: Devin is strongest when the ticket is narrow, the repo is accessible, and success can be checked with clear tests or acceptance criteria. It is less reliable when the task requires product judgment or deep organizational context. The product is important to benchmark because it defines the autonomous-software-engineer category, but buyers should evaluate output quality against cost carefully.
If you are comparing these agents, these nearby alternatives are worth opening next.
Claude Code leads by 0.8 on current Ruling scores; compare it against ChatGPT Advanced Data Analysis before shortlisting.
Cursor leads by 0.6 on current Ruling scores; compare it against ChatGPT Advanced Data Analysis before shortlisting.
Codex CLI leads by 0.4 on current Ruling scores; compare it against ChatGPT Advanced Data Analysis before shortlisting.
Send the URL to teammates when you need a compact, review-backed agent shortlist.
/compare/chatgpt-advanced-data-analysis-vs-devin
